VANCOUVER (Reuters) – Legal professionals for Huawei Chief Monetary Officer Meng Wanzhou will reply Thursday to the Canadian prosecutor’s arguments calling for Meng to be extradited to america on financial institution fraud costs.
FILE PHOTO: Huawei Chief Monetary Officer Meng Wanzhou leaves her house to attend her extradition listening to at B.C. Supreme Courtroom in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada January 22, 2020. REUTERS/Jennifer Gauthier
Thursday’s proceedings will wrap up the primary section of the extradition course of and authorized specialists have mentioned it could possibly be years earlier than a ultimate resolution is reached within the case, since Canada’s justice system permits many choices to be appealed.
On Wednesday, prosecutors argued that Meng must be extradited on fraud costs, and that opposite to her defence argument, the case will not be solely about violation of the U.S. sanctions towards Iran.
“Fraud, not sanctions violations is on the coronary heart of this case,” prosecutor Robert Frater informed the choose on Wednesday.
Meng, 47, has mentioned she is harmless and is combating extradition.
Though the courts had put aside two full days for the prosecution to current its case, the prosecution took solely half of a day, and closed its arguments earlier than lunch on Wednesday.
America has charged Meng with financial institution fraud, and accused her of deceptive HSBC Holdings Plc (HSBA.L) about Huawei Applied sciences Co Ltd’s [HWT.UL] enterprise in Iran.
However Meng’s authorized staff argued that “double criminality,” is the central subject on this case. Underneath Canadian extradition legal guidelines, an individual can solely be extradited if the offence they’re alleged to have dedicated abroad can be thought of unlawful in Canada. That is generally known as “double criminality.”
Not like america, Canada didn’t have sanctions towards Iran on the time Canadian officers approved the beginning of the extradition course of, her attorneys have mentioned.
“In actuality, sanctions violation is the essence of the alleged misconduct … america has a worldwide curiosity in implementing its Iran sanctions. Sanctions drive this case,” Richard Peck, one in all Meng’s attorneys added.
Frater argued Wednesday that the choose’s job was to “be sure that Canada doesn’t change into a secure haven for fraudsters.”
He additionally mentioned it isn’t the choose’s function to find out whether or not Meng is responsible of fraud, however whether or not the alleged behaviour is also prosecuted as fraud in Canada.
Courtroom proceedings present america issued the arrest warrant, which Canada acted on in December 2018, as a result of it believes Meng lined up makes an attempt by Huawei-linked firms to promote gear to Iran, breaking U.S. sanctions towards the nation.
Meng’s court docket proceedings have attracted world media curiosity and the case has strained relationship between China and Canada.
Meng, the daughter of Huawei’s billionaire founder Ren Zhengfei, stays free on bail in Canada, and has been dwelling in a mansion in Vancouver’s unique Shaughnessy neighborhood.
Meng’s authorized staff is at present solely scheduled to name proof within the final week of April, and a second section of the trial, specializing in abuse of course of and whether or not Canadian officers adopted the legislation whereas arresting Meng, is about to start in June. Closing arguments are anticipated within the final week of September and first week of October.
Writing by Denny Thomas; Modifying by Lisa Shumaker